Earl Weiss
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 6,342
- Reaction score
- 926
- Points
- 113
Reading the recent Car Wash College Tip of the month on figuring solution cost per car, and having heard the methodology before I can't help but wonder why it seems overly complicated and somewhat arbitrary to measure chemical usage for "3 cars" and then figure the cost.
This suggests actual cars. Were they 3 SUVs, or mini coopers? How fast was the line going etc. Why not just have the operator look at their operation and note what the average time is that the relevant arch / equipment runs for what they consider to be an average car at average speed.
Say for example the operator determines an average run interval of 20 seconds. Then, just tell them to turn on that function for 3-5 times that amount, or whatever factor and go from there.
Perhaps even turn it on and then off for the three average intervals in case there is some lag involved to account for.
Wouldn't that be simpler and perhaps a better yardstick?
This suggests actual cars. Were they 3 SUVs, or mini coopers? How fast was the line going etc. Why not just have the operator look at their operation and note what the average time is that the relevant arch / equipment runs for what they consider to be an average car at average speed.
Say for example the operator determines an average run interval of 20 seconds. Then, just tell them to turn on that function for 3-5 times that amount, or whatever factor and go from there.
Perhaps even turn it on and then off for the three average intervals in case there is some lag involved to account for.
Wouldn't that be simpler and perhaps a better yardstick?