I visited a wash yesterday that had "foaming wax" on the top package. It had the same foam consistency of a detergent or presoak, but when rinsed, it displayed the water shedding properties of a ccp. This wash had no foam polish or conditioner or tri foam.
I know a lot of us use a foam polish or foam conditioner or tri foam on our top package, followed by a ccp. Other than the display properties of the foam polish or conditioner, I am not sure if it yeilds much of an actual result on the results of the car. I have read on this forum of operators using foam brush detergent as their foam polish/conditioner step - that cannot really be doing anything to enhance the quality of the car.
Is a foaming wax/ccp a viable substitue? It provides the foam show and the water shedding properites all in one product. I am thinking you can save chemical costs (by using only one chemical) and still get the same show and result.
Any input would be appreciated.
Mike
I know a lot of us use a foam polish or foam conditioner or tri foam on our top package, followed by a ccp. Other than the display properties of the foam polish or conditioner, I am not sure if it yeilds much of an actual result on the results of the car. I have read on this forum of operators using foam brush detergent as their foam polish/conditioner step - that cannot really be doing anything to enhance the quality of the car.
Is a foaming wax/ccp a viable substitue? It provides the foam show and the water shedding properites all in one product. I am thinking you can save chemical costs (by using only one chemical) and still get the same show and result.
Any input would be appreciated.
Mike