“I am looking to convert…. hand car wash into……less labor….” “Considering…Touchless”
“My concern is…..getting ….clean…...” “The tunnel is 70' long…..”
The first step in designing a wash system is property planning – width and depth. The reasoning is to match system with potential of site/location (property/market).
This is accomplished by designing system to handle demand during peak conditions – peak hour.
If the developer followed this guideline, I would suspect a peak hour or 50 or 60 cars with the additional capacity available for growth or slack.
This is based on rule of thumb a conveyor can produce 10 cars an hour for every ten feet of conveyor length.
If you want to keep friction or upgrade to hybrid (friction plus touch-less), this can be done within a 70’ length by installing a five-touch module with, say, high-pressure wheels.
If you want to convert to touch-less only, the primary constraint is conveyor/tunnel length because it correlates with time on machine.
There are many factors in touch-less cleaning but most important, in this case, are detergent and product water quality, dwell time (allows chemical reaction) and impingement (i.e. zero degree nozzles, fan spray, oscillation, etc.).
Here, dwell is most important because the tunnel length is fixed (it already exists).
So, if you calibrate a short conveyor to clean effectively, slowing down line operating speed so the chemical can react properly, end result might be insufficient capacity to satisfy demand during peak hour.
The consequences of this could be long waiting lines and lost business, both on a daily and annual basis.
So, do you automated with touch-less only at considerable capital cost plus greater utilities and chemical to produce dubious quality and less quantity
or
automate with friction at less capital cost that uses less utility and chemical than touch-less only to produce a known quality and greater quantity?
Hope this helps.