Exclude motorists that wash their own vehicle because they enjoy or prefer to, as in wand-bay, and you are left with a majority of motorists. In this group, a smaller portion will purchase on the basis of convenience and value and a larger portion will value these attributes but price will be more important. Inject express exterior into an area that is predominately self-service and it becomes obvious why the format works.
Express solves the customer?s problem quickly with less waiting and a low base price. It provides a higher quality than in-bay and wand-bay relative to the overall time. Free vacuums, wiping towels and window cleaner provide additional value. Customers can acquire these attributes at an overall lower price than can be purchased at a self-service. This offer is not only an attractive in its own right it also creates the opportunity for self-service users to cross over.
Competing against ?free? is difficult but not impossible. I have been doing it for years. Sonny?s and ICA offer free advice on their websites. Sonny?s boasts that it charges zero for consulting services. Of course, everyone knows that nothing is really free. Distributors get paid for this through the price paid for equipment, installation and inventory.
I compete on the basis of value because I charge a
fee. I provide services that are far more in-depth using state-of-the-art methods and procedures. Moreover, the customer receives unbiased and objective opinion by an independent third-party.
Similarly, self-service competing against express would benefit by competing on value (improving the offer) rather than price or ?free.? This could include things like giving more time on vacuums, offering more payment options, improving the quality and/or capacity of in-bay, using higher quality chemicals, offering ?green? products, converting in-bay to mini-tunnel, offering new services (i.e. express detail, service inspection) and promoting the offer.