JJJakubowski
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 165
- Reaction score
- 74
- Points
- 28
Pat, I agree that the original version that had the column (on far left) with the prices for the individual services was definitely confusing. BUT I fully appreciate the intent. Namely, to quantify value for all those individual services --- to give the customer a handle on just how "great a dealio" (in $$$ and ???) he was getting with the higher tiered services.
I mitigated that "confusion" by leading (big 'n bold) with the actual costs of the 3 tiers; reducing the size of those individual prices/services and tucking 'em away a bit off to the side. The confusion over that column could be lessened more by, perhaps, adding the word "VALUE" over that column. Or, if one is really concerned about befuddling some customers --- simply remove those "Value/Prices" altogether ... as seen in this version.
JJJ/SSCWN
I mitigated that "confusion" by leading (big 'n bold) with the actual costs of the 3 tiers; reducing the size of those individual prices/services and tucking 'em away a bit off to the side. The confusion over that column could be lessened more by, perhaps, adding the word "VALUE" over that column. Or, if one is really concerned about befuddling some customers --- simply remove those "Value/Prices" altogether ... as seen in this version.
JJJ/SSCWN
Attachments
-
35.4 KB Views: 39