Injectors don't need changed to change ratios. Screw in tips change dilution and the effect is immediate, no need to drain tank and refill. Actual change maybe the same difficulty but testing and tweaking is quicker and easier because you do not need to refill tank and check results.I need enlightenment;
1. >> one injector per function per bay.<< So, with 4 LP functions and 6 bays that is 24 injectors vs 4 flo jets and 4 hydrominders & Tanks and this is simpler because? In my experience injectors have been virtually trouble free - hydrominders and flojets are not incredibly problematic but injectors have been better.
2. >>Even pressure (Flojets tend to pulse)<< Like to hear from others. Due to volume FJ produces vs the .05 nozzle this is not something I experience at the bay. - Maybe it is something specific in our setup
3. >> more consistent mixing of chemistry<< This is a function of water pressure and can be solved with a pump to a hydrominder, injector bank for any holding tank. why is adding a pump and keeping everything else better than replacing everything with a single pump?
4. >>much better foam show<< Don't see how. This is function of air and solution mixing, not dilution from whatever system. Enlighten me please. Also a function of volume. See Tom Hoffman's youtube video... I have never seen a flojet able to reproduce that type of triple foam, regardless of product and dilution
5. >>potentially faster change over times<< How? Solution line is full with check valve T'd above boom either way.
6. >>easier adjustments to dilution ratios<< 24 injectors versus 4 with anohter system and it''s easier to change injectors than 4 hydrominder tips? Injector pumps? Dosatron?
Thanks for taking time to reply like this Earl. I appreciate your thoughts because it forces me to consider if this is actually a good idea or an overly expensive/complicated solution. If I go through with the project I will followup with my results.