Nice video.
There is a lot more going on with this tunnel than just the drying approach.
Notice absence of water over-spray inside the tunnel as compared to say a Sonny’s hybrid with lots of expensive high-pressure equipment. I suspect this tunnel uses a lot less fresh water and energy than comparable length tunnel. Same for drying approach. Looks like two sets of three producers or 90 hp. This is pretty low for such a long tunnel. Then there is the slow turning, quieter, soft material brushes sort of like N/S’ auto-hand-wash approach.
Combined with lights and foamers, Belanger has a differentiated product for operators and consumers.
As for RO water, it is no different than tap water except the contaminants and any minerals have been filtered out or rejected. Main purpose in carwash is to help prevent remaining water drops from leaving spots. This is the reason it’s put on last. Drying agent contains contaminants (i.e.
soap, mineral oil, etc.).
Judging drying effectives is tricky because you have to consider the condition of vehicles getting washed.
For example, washes get cars with relatively fresh coat of wax was well as those that are never waxed and everything in between. You also have to consider product being applied. Hot wax beads and dries better than drying agent.
There is also a lot of friction in this tunnel, and I suspect the “clean” has hand-finished qualities. So, generally speaking, the potential for producing a dry car would be greater. Cleaner car leads to dryer car.