DiamondWash
Well-known member
I was told they asked the same question and was told this is the "Gen 5" system no retrofits.
Could be, but it looks more like what PDQ did with the G5 model. It looks like they are turbo nozzles, not oscillators. Also - the separate soap manifold - and still using one arm instead of two. Certainly could have been influenced by what Petit is doing, but still kept it unique by comparison. Not sure if PDQ still offers the G5.Guess they realized Petit was taking away alot of business and this is a great way to match some of what Petit offers. Hope it makes a positive difference in cleaning.
This looks similar to the PDQ G5 design to me. We just switched from G5's to razors that do not have the rotary nozzles. Not sure rotary nozzles will improve wash quality because the clean of the razors seem to match the G5's.I'm praying that WW offers a retrofit kit to this system
edit to add: my Razor3’s that were installed in 2016 are still cranking out clean cars with very few issues. My customers still exclaim “ILOVE this Carwash. It’s the only one that actually gets my car clean”. I have to remind myself that just because it’s new and shiny doesn’t mean it’s better than what you already have.
It's a no, on PDQ still offering G5's..Could be, but it looks more like what PDQ did with the G5 model. It looks like they are turbo nozzles, not oscillators. Also - the separate soap manifold - and still using one arm instead of two. Certainly could have been influenced by what Petit is doing, but still kept it unique by comparison. Not sure if PDQ still offers the G5.
How do they have two separate manifolds that pivot around a common point?I was told the trolley has been redesigned for this system which means if anybody here who has owned a Ryko OHD or Radius knows it's no longer a single line providing chemical and high pressure rinse.
How do they have two separate manifolds that pivot around a common point?
Why does everyone have to reinvent the wheel ?hell it works leave it alone!! Look at the lw4k
How did they miss that?The foam on the arch is BS, partially blocks the nozzles such that we had to trim the foam to make the openings larger - still not perfect.
I haven’t actually looked to see what nozzle sizes or patterns they are using but I may change them to the nozzle kit that General sells for the LW4000 and see it it makes a difference on the impact.Work out the bugs on the existing equipment first
Ok, if/when you do, please let us know immediately.I haven’t actually looked to see what nozzle sizes or patterns they are using but I may change them to the nozzle kit that General sells for the LW4000 and see it it makes a difference on the impact.
I would say it's not lined up right. You may need to remove the nozzles, then slide off the blue cover and refit it. It may not have been fitted correctly.CarwaahIreland, do you or anyone else, have rhe exact nozzles for the top of the arch? Mine has 7, not 5. Maybe replace the inner 5? Or 1,3,5, & 7...?
Also, anybody got good advice on the foam on the arch? What are yall doing to keep it from blocking the PS & hp rinse?